UIChicagoUIChicago
CoursesProfessors
My SchoolSparkyAI
UIChicagoUIChicago
CoursesProfessors
My SchoolSparkyAI
3.6

Duosi Meng

University of Illinois Chicago

#730 overall#2 in Chinese16 reviews

3.6 rating across 16 reviews, one of the strongest profiles in Chinese.

  • Rating: 3.6 from 16 reviews.
  • Overall rank: #747 of 1263.
  • Department rank: #2 of 2.
  • Courses taught in dataset: 4.
  • Best course ranks: CHIN 101 (Elementary Chinese I) (#2/2) and CHIN 102 (Elementary Chinese II) (#2/2).

Mixed feedback overall, likely course dependent. Overall ranking is fairly low compared to peers. Within the department, it is currently ranked lower. This rating is based on a smaller number of reviews, so it may be noisy.

It may come down to fit and which class you take with them.

Department
Chinese
School
University of Illinois Chicago
Annual Salary
$80,564
Sr Lecturer
View on RateMyProfessors →

Course Rankings

How this professor ranks among peers in each course they teach

CHIN 101
Elementary Chinese I
#2
Ranked #2 of 2 professors in this course.
CHIN 102
Elementary Chinese II
#2
Ranked #2 of 2 professors in this course.
CHIN 104
Intermediate Chinese II
#2
Ranked #2 of 2 professors in this course.
CHIN 200
Adv Communication in Chinese
#1
Ranked #1 of 1 professors in this course.
CHIN 209
Adv Chinese Language & Culture
#2
Ranked #2 of 2 professors in this course.
Course
Title
Rank
  • CHIN 101
    Elementary Chinese I
    #2 of 2
  • CHIN 102
    Elementary Chinese II
    #2 of 2
  • CHIN 104
    Intermediate Chinese II
    #2 of 2
  • CHIN 200
    Adv Communication in Chinese
    #1 of 1
  • CHIN 209
    Adv Chinese Language & Culture
    #2 of 2

Compare with similar professors

Nearby picks from the same department or the same course mix, so you can compare without backing out to the full list.

Bridget Wang
Chinese
5.0
9 reviews4 shared courses
Open profile →
UIChicago by Sparky Labs
Powered by real course, professor, and campus data
Read the methodology
uicratings@gmail.com
Student-built, unofficial, and transparent about sources